Brooks Glycerin 20 vs Hoka Clifton 9: Two Cushion Philosophies

Overview

These two represent different approaches to cushioned running. Brooks goes for thick, soft foam with a traditional running shoe shape. Hoka uses a lower-drop, rocker-geometry design that creates a rolling, efficient stride. Both are wildly popular for good reason.

Cushioning

The Glycerin 20 has a taller stack (36mm) and softer foam. It's the more cushioned shoe objectively. The Clifton 9 feels cushioned but in a different way — its 5mm drop and Meta-Rocker geometry distribute impact across the entire stride rather than absorbing it in one spot.

Weight

The Clifton 9 is significantly lighter at 9.2 oz vs 10.6 oz. That 1.4 oz difference is noticeable, especially on longer runs. Hoka achieves this with lighter EVA-based foam that sacrifices some plushness for weight savings.

Ride Geometry

The Glycerin 20's 10mm drop encourages a heel-strike pattern. The Clifton 9's 5mm drop promotes a more midfoot landing. The Clifton's rocker also makes it feel faster and more propulsive at all paces.

Who Should Buy Each

Choose the Brooks Glycerin 20 if: You want the softest, most cushioned ride for long runs and recovery. Best for heel strikers.

Choose the Hoka Clifton 9 if: You want a lightweight, versatile daily trainer with a smooth rolling ride. Best for midfoot strikers or runners who want efficiency.